Investor Revolt at Shell: $4 Trillion in Assets Push for Stricter Emissions Targets
Listen to this story:
A significant shareholder push is urging Shell to adopt more ambitious climate targets, setting the stage for a potentially pivotal annual general meeting (AGM) in May. 27 investor groups, representing $4 trillion in assets, have co-filed a resolution calling on Shell to align its emissions reduction goals with the Paris Agreement.
This action comes in response to Shell’s decision to abandon plans for cutting oil and gas production before 2030, a move that raised concerns among investors about the company’s commitment to sustainability. The proposed resolution specifically focuses on setting “credible scope 3 absolute emissions target,” which refers to the indirect emissions generated by the use of Shell’s products, such as fuel used in vehicles and machinery.
“We urge Shell to set a credible scope 3 absolute emissions target,” stated Diandra Soobiah, head of responsible investment at Nest, one of the participating investors. “This would demonstrate leadership, show Shell is serious about transitioning its business, and play a role in generating real-world change.“
It’s worth noting that scope 3 emissions account for a substantial 95% of Shell’s overall carbon footprint. By focusing on this area, investors aim to address the full environmental impact of Shell’s activities, not just its direct operations.
This is not the first time Shell has faced scrutiny from investors on climate issues. Last year, a similar resolution received 20% of the vote at the AGM, signaling growing shareholder dissent. This year’s initiative takes a more flexible approach, dropping a specific 2030 target in favor of broader long-term goals, hoping to garner wider support.
Shell, unsurprisingly, remains cautious about adopting stricter targets. The company’s board argues that ambitious scope 3 goals could negatively impact shareholders and potentially hinder the transition to a low-carbon future by limiting fossil fuel production during a critical period.
Mark van Baal, founder of Follow This, the organization leading the investor campaign, disagrees. “Large shareholders hold the key to tackling the climate crisis with their votes at shareholders’ meetings,” he emphasizes. “Shell will only change if more shareholders vote for change.“
The upcoming AGM promises to be a crucial juncture for Shell, as it navigates the delicate balance between shareholder interests, climate concerns, and its own long-term vision. Can the oil giant find a path that satisfies both investors and environmental demands? The May meeting will offer a key glimpse into what the future holds for Shell and the broader energy landscape.