• BoE finalises strengthened climate risk expectations for banks and insurers, replacing 2019 rules.
• New policy requires stronger board accountability, better scenario use, and improved data quality.
• Firms must review compliance and produce action plans, with supervisors expecting evidence after six months.

The Bank of England has issued its most stringent climate risk policy to date, requiring banks and insurers to lift board-level oversight, tighten scenario modelling, and improve data integrity to reflect the rising financial impact of climate events. The policy, titled Supervisory Statement 4/25, replaces the central bank’s initial 2019 rulebook and takes effect immediately.

The Bank’s Prudential Regulation Authority said the shift reflects five years of adaptation, growing climate volatility, and uneven industry progress. Many firms have built internal capabilities since 2019, but supervisors see persistent gaps that could undermine market stability as climate-related losses accelerate.

The PRA stated that climate risk management remains a moving target. It said that understanding and effective risk management of climate-related risks remains challenging and continues to evolve. The PRA’s updated expectations respond to industry calls for greater clarity and consistency, supporting firms as they build their resilience against climate-related risks.

Governance, modelling, disclosure: expectations sharpen

The new framework demands visible board accountability. Senior management must demonstrate direct oversight, with clear structures for ownership, challenge, and escalation. Risk officers are expected to integrate climate materially within enterprise risk frameworks rather than treat it as a thematic or peripheral consideration.

Scenario analysis, previously treated as an exploratory tool, now carries explicit decision-making weight. Firms will be required to evidence how scenario outputs influence strategy, balance sheet planning, credit allocation, and insurance underwriting. The PRA expects climate modelling to be robust and transparent, with assumptions clearly justified and stress outcomes linked to executive decisions.

Data quality is treated as a priority risk in itself. Supervisors want firms to assess the depth and reliability of climate-related datasets, identify material gaps, and develop plans to upgrade granularity. Weak data will no longer be viewed as a structural constraint but as a deficiency requiring remediation.

Disclosure expectations also tighten. Reporting must align with evolving global standards, improving comparability across firms and ensuring markets can price climate exposure more accurately. Banks and insurers will be expected to disclose both risk and opportunity profiles, helping investors track capital shifts into adaptation, resilience, and low-carbon transition sectors.

Proportionate, but not optional

The Bank said it recognises that climate risk vulnerability correlates less with firm size than with business model and geography. The new expectations are therefore proportionate, allowing smaller firms to adopt less sophisticated methods where appropriate. The PRA stressed that simplicity is acceptable only if it still enables sound risk management.

Firms must now complete internal assessments of their readiness, identify weaknesses, and produce credible remediation plans. Supervisors are advised to allow at least six months before requesting evidence. The central bank has made clear that implementation should begin immediately, signalling that passive compliance will not meet regulatory intent.

The final policy reflects feedback on earlier proposals released this year. Key revisions give firms more flexibility on scenario type and allow longer-term horizons to be supported by narrative scenarios rather than precise quantification. Respondents broadly supported the move to update expectations and did not challenge the case for regulatory intervention.

RELATED ARTICLE: Bank of England Proposes Updated Climate Risk Expectations for UK Banks, Insurers

What matters for boards, investors, and market stability

For directors, the message is uncomplicated. Climate risk must sit at the core of strategic and capital planning, with traceable links between scenario outcomes and business decisions. Governance cannot be delegated downward or siloed within sustainability teams. The PRA expects climate exposure to shape asset allocation, liquidity buffers, underwriting appetite, and client engagement.

Investors gain clearer information channels. Enhanced disclosures will reduce opacity in banks’ and insurers’ climate exposures, creating better signals for pricing risk across portfolios. Data upgrades may also increase demand for granular emissions information in corporate lending and insurance underwriting, widening the policy’s reach far beyond financial institutions.

The global context is decisive. Systemic climate shocks are no longer hypothetical. As financial centres embed climate risk into prudential rules, cross-border institutions will need to align management systems to meet rising supervisory expectations in the United Kingdom, the European Union, and other markets. The BoE’s policy positions London firmly among jurisdictions advancing climate-aligned prudential standards.

The policy is now active, the expectations clear, and the horizon accelerating. Banks and insurers that move early will shape capital flows in a climate-exposed world. Those that delay will find adaptation both costlier and more closely scrutinised.

Follow ESG News on LinkedIn