LOADING

Type to search

High Court Blocks Plans for the UK’s First Deep Coal Mine in Over 30 Years

High Court Blocks Plans for the UK’s First Deep Coal Mine in Over 30 Years

High Court Blocks Plans for the UK's First Deep Coal Mine in Over 30 Years
Listen to this story:

Key Impact Points:

  • Legal Flaw: The High Court ruled that the assumption the coal mine would not increase greenhouse gas emissions was “legally flawed.”
  • Climate Victory: Environmental groups hailed the ruling as a major win, with potential global implications for fossil fuel projects.
  • Economic Setback: Supporters of the mine argue the decision will hinder local economic development and job creation.

Plans to build the UK’s first deep coal mine in over three decades have been blocked by the High Court. The mine, proposed for Whitehaven in Cumbria, faced legal challenges from environmental groups over its potential contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.

Legal Challenge

Friends of the Earth (FOTE) and South Lakes Action on Climate Change (SLACC) brought the case, arguing that the environmental impact of burning the extracted coal was not adequately considered. Judge Justice Holgate sided with the campaigners, stating, “The assumption that the proposed mine would not produce a net increase in greenhouse gas emissions, or would be a net zero mine, is legally flawed.”

Environmental Victory

Victoria Marsom from Friends of the Earth called the ruling “a massive victory.” Duncan Pollard, a trustee at SLACC, echoed the sentiment, calling it a “huge relief” and urged that the coal mine proposal be permanently shelved. Pollard added, “We sincerely hope any re-examination of the coal mine considers all relevant issues.”

Professor Rebecca Willis of Lancaster University said the decision could set a global precedent: “Surely we’ve realized, through today’s judgement, that there’s no way you can open a new mine and keep within climate targets.”

Global Ramifications

The ruling could have international significance.

FOTE lawyer Niall Toru stated, “The case against it is overwhelming: it would have huge climate impacts, its coal isn’t needed, and it harms the UK’s international reputation on climate.” He added that similar legal challenges against fossil fuel projects are already being pursued abroad, saying, “This ground-breaking judgement could advance the global phase-out of fossil fuels.”

Maggie Mason from SLACC said, “Mr. Justice Holgate has forensically destroyed their net zero, climate-neutral coal mine claims.”

Related Article: UK Commits £21.7 Billion to Carbon Capture Despite Project Delays and Rising Costs

Economic Concerns

However, local supporters of the project, including former Conservative mayor of Copeland Mike Starkie, expressed disappointment. Starkie said the decision was “devastating” for West Cumbria’s economy, as the mine was expected to bring 500 jobs and significant infrastructure improvements. “West Cumbria was due to get a massive boost to its local economy,” he lamented.

Similarly, former Conservative MP Mark Jenkinson warned that the UK may now have to import metallurgical coal from countries like Russia, stating, “If we don’t mine coking coal here… then we import it.”

West Cumbria Mining (WCM), the company behind the project, has said it will consider the implications of the ruling before making further comments.

Topics

Related Articles